Federal Government efforts to defeat the Rule of Law for the Disabled by interfering with the Equal Access to Justice Act
















If you seek a single practitioner attorney dedicated to achieving veterans VA benefits and Social Security disability benefits, I welcome your contacting my office. All attorney fee contracts with clients are contingent upon my winning past due awards and my attorney fees are twenty percent for VA cases and twenty-five percent for Social Security cases - my fee contracts are posted on this web site. My contracts comply with the United States Code and are approved by the Department of Veterans Affairs and the Social Security Administration. Although my office seems traditional, I use computer technology to enhance my legal efforts with paperless record storage, professional level voice recognition software and comprehensive legal management computers. In this manner, I can offer competitive attorney services and reduced overhead. I am honored to represent you towards receiving rightful benefits if you are disabled.
         Hugh Cox

Governmental efforts to defeat the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA) for the disabled

One of the noble and just laws passed by our Congress and enacted into law in 1948 as 28 United States Code 2412 was the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA). This act allowed a citizen to sue the federal government and it further allowed the Court to pay the citizen's attorney if the federal government was not substantially justified in its denial of the citizen's constitutional rights after the citizen prevailed in the case. The EAJA is now under assault by federal officials in Social Security cases in an effort to hamper attorneys from collection of these fees. Most importantly, citizens are the victims of this federal effort if it is successful. The rule of law is under attack.

An interesting history of EAJA is at http://www.equalaccess2justice.us/ .

A superb discussion of this current effort during the summer of 2007 by senior Social Security federal officials is found at http://www.theombudsman.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=26&t=19 .

Federal officials who wish to do away with EAJA now are using the same "incrementalization" tactics used in the "Contract on America" in 2002. The first efforts require that the check for attorney fees be made payable to the plaintiff rather than the attorney on the unexplained theory that the money is for the plaintiff to pay the attorney. Previously for decades, the checks were made payable directly to the citizen's attorney. Most plaintiffs will be honest with their attorneys, but these federal officials will undermine the EAJA purpose by encouraging plaintiffs to keep the money.

Attorneys fees are calculated by the cost of living index found on the Bureau of Labor Statistics website. Currently, these regional fees are about $165 per hour (this hourly fee must include the attorney's staff salaries, office costs, supplies, etc.) are are much less than the federal government pays its own contracted attorneys ($188.00 to $308.00). See: http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d01887r.pdf .

EAJA is one of the cornerstones of the rule of law giving access to courthouse justice to citizens who cannot afford attorneys except by EAJA attorney fees. Our traditional American justice is threatened by these changes in the payment of EAJA attorney fees.

Hit Counter since October 14, 2007